Journal of Infection and Public Health
Volume 2, Issue 3 , Pages 147-152, 2009

Resistance pattern of breakthrough urinary tract infections in children on antibiotic prophylaxis

  • Ali Reza Nateghian

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Infectious Diseases Department, Ali Asghar Children's Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • ,
  • Joan L. Robinson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics and Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Room 8213, Aberhart Centre One, 11402 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2J3. Tel.: +1 780 407 3666; fax: +1 780 407 7136.
  • ,
  • Shahab Mohandessi

      Affiliations

    • Ali Asghar Children's Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • ,
  • Nakysa Hooman

      Affiliations

    • Pediatric Nephrology Department, Ali Asghar Children's Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Received 27 May 2009; received in revised form 7 August 2009; accepted 11 August 2009.

Summary 

Prophylactic antibiotics are commonly used for prevention of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in children. It was postulated that the organisms and resistance patterns of breakthrough infections would differ with the choice of antimicrobial prophylaxis. This was a retrospective descriptive study of all breakthroughs UTI from 2000 to 2006 in children over 1 month of age discharged from a referral children's hospital in Tehran, Iran on continuous antibiotic prophylaxis for UTIs. Fifty-seven children discharged on prophylaxis had breakthrough UTIs of which 32 (56%) had a previously diagnosed urinary tract anomaly. Escherichia coli was responsible for the majority of infections irrespective of choice of prophylaxis. Thirty-three of 56 breakthrough UTIs (59%) were with organisms that were resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic. There was an increased incidence of resistance to prophylaxis in children on cefixime (16 of 22; 78%) when compared with children on cephalexin (7 of 19; 37%; p=0.02) and a trend toward increased resistance when compared with children on trimethoprim–sulfamethoxasole (3 of 8; 37%) (p=0.10). In conclusion, the resistance pattern of organisms causing breakthrough UTIs varies with the choice of prophylaxis which should be taken into consideration in chosing empiric therapy for such infections.

Keywords: Antibiotic prophylaxis, Cefixime, Pyelonephritis, Resistance, Antibiotic, Urinary tract infection

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1876-0341(09)00057-4

doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2009.08.002

Journal of Infection and Public Health
Volume 2, Issue 3 , Pages 147-152, 2009