| | Epidemiology and outcome of snake bite cases evaluated at a Tertiary Care Hospital in OmanReceived 25 May 2009; received in revised form 11 July 2009; accepted 10 September 2009. Summary ObjectivesTo study the epidemiology of snake bite patients evaluated at the Royal Hospital, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, and to study their clinical course and outcome. MethodsA retrospective study of 65 adult patients presenting at Royal Hospital following a snake bite from May 2006 to August 2008. ResultsThe main symptoms were local pain at the bite site (26 patients, 40%) and swelling (17 patients, 26%). Only five patients (7.7%) had signs of bleeding. After assessment, only 47 of the 65 patients were admitted. White cell count (WCC) was raised in 15 cases (23%) on presentation to the emergency room. Prothrombin time was prolonged in 34 patients (52%) and APTT was prolonged in 25 patients (38%) on presentation. Thirty-six patients received anti-snake venom (antivenom) at a mean time of 8 h after the bite and 4 h after arrival in the emergency department. Patients with deranged coagulation profile needed a mean of fourteen vials of antivenom for correction of the abnormal coagulation profile. Two patients died: both had delayed presentation to the hospital. ConclusionPatients with envenoming following snakebite should receive antivenom as soon as possible: delayed presentation or administration may be very dangerous. The decision to give antivenom should be initiated as soon as possible after patients’ arrival at the Emergency Department and the use of the whole blood clotting test (WBCT) may facilitate the early administration of antivenom. Introduction  Snake bites cause considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide. The highest burden exists in South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa. At least 421,000 envenomings and 20,000 deaths occur each year worldwide due to snake bite [1]. A study done in Saudi Arabia showed that 2.4% of the total admissions to a regional hospital (from May 2002 to May 2005) were due to snake bites [2]. The incidence of snakebite is not known in Oman: there have been no formal studies, snakebite is a non-reportable condition and it is treated in multiple centres. Early medical attention and administration of antivenom, when indicated, are the main outcome determinants [3]. However, in many parts of the world, there are continuing crises in the production, deployment, and accessibility of antivenom [4]. Most Omani snakes are harmless. Of the 9 venomous terrestrial snakes, 9% of envenomations are by the Saw-scaled Viper (Echis carinatus). This aggressive snake occurs throughout Oman, especially in rocky areas. About 9% of bites are caused by a related species, Burton's carpet snake (Echis coloratus) of hilly regions, or the Horned Viper (Cerastes gasperetti) of deserts. All three vipers have broad heads and 2-hinged fangs, and the venom causes impaired clotting. Only in Dhofar are found the non-aggressive Arabian cobra (venom is neurotoxic) and the indolent Puff adder (impaired clotting), but bites have never been reported in this region [5]. Methods  The records of all patients with snake bite evaluated in Royal Hospital from May 2006 to August 2008 were reviewed. Since January 2006 the Royal Hospital became a paperless hospital, all the medical records of patients were computerized including investigations, medications and case notes of patients. The inclusion criteria were age over 13 (considered as an adult patient in Royal Hospital) and confirmed or strongly suspected snake bite. Patients with an uncertain history of snake bite or other animal and insect stings were excluded. Clinical information (age, gender and co-morbid conditions), snake bite-related information (such as time, place and snake type) and management-related information (such as laboratory tests, treatment given to the patient and the final outcome of the case) were extracted from the patients’ records. The treatment sheet was missing in 3 cases. Discussion  The profile of patients and bites in Oman was similar to many other studies conducted in Asia and Africa [6], [7]; most patients were males aged 21–30 years and most events took place in the evening the usual irrigation time in Oman. This also explains why most of the patient could not give a good description of the offending snake. In the absence of good descriptions and because this was a retrospective study, we were unable to identify the biting species. The main species of venomous snake in the north of Oman are E. carinatus sochureki and E. omanensis. Both of these are likely to cause shock, incoagulable blood and bleeding. Despite the absence of definitive identification, there are still some useful lessons to be learnt from this study. Although most of the patients reached the hospital within 2–3 h of the bite, some took much longer, either because they had no means of transport or because they delayed seeking medical help as they lived in rural areas and they did not take the bite seriously. Early presentation to the emergency room is closely linked to increased efficacy of the antivenom and good outcomes [3]. Education of the population about the potential adverse consequences of snakebite and delayed presentation in areas where it is common could be very important. Thirty-two patients received antibiotics although there was no documentation of local inflammation or signs of infection signs. Some appear to have been started on antibiotics because of leucocytosis, some prophylactically and some because they had some swelling at the bite site. Antibiotics are normally necessary in snakebite if there is necrosis of the wound and there is generally no role for routine antibiotic prophylaxis [8]. Education of medical personnel is necessary to prevent unnecessary prescription of antibiotics. Over half of the patients were pre-medicated with antihistamine and/or steroids prior to receiving antivenom. Despite this, 2 patients had “anaphylactoid” shock after starting antivenom. They were treated with epinephrine, antihistamine and steroids and both fully recovered. The role of routine prophylaxis is still highly debated and only adrenaline has ever been shown to be of benefit in clinical trials [9]. The average time from presentation to the emergency room to receive first dose of antivenom was approximately 4 h. This delay could be potentially life-threatening. It sometimes occurred because of lack of antivenom at the Emergency Department and sometimes because antivenom was started only after the patient reached to the ward. In addition, laboratory results of coagulation profile took around 90–120 min to be released. Evidence of a coagulopathy was the major indication for commencing antivenom. This can be achieved by simply using the whole blood clotting test (WBCT), a bedside test which if used in our practice, could shorten the time between arrival at the Emergency Department and starting antivenom to less than 30 min [3]. The average number of vials needed to restore coagulation was 13. Nine out of the 36 patients who received antivenom received further doses of antivenom after restoring coagulation. The aim of these doses was to ensure the persistence of the normal coagulation, although there is no rationale for this with most antivenoms. This practice reflects the differences in the amount and frequency of administration of antivenom recommended by guidelines produced by different countries and organizations [3], [10], [11] and guidelines for Oman and the middle east would be useful. Appropriate training may also help to improve outcomes as demonstrated in other settings [12]. Only 2 patients died. One of them presented 3 days after the snakebite in a coma. His initial head CT showed evidence of an intracerebral bleed. He was referred for neurosurgical intervention but it was not successful. The other patient had severe coagulopathy and bleeding from the gums that did not respond to antivenom: he died suddenly with a presumed intracerebral bleed. A single patient had acute renal failure that improved dramatically and was discharged with follow up in the nephrology clinic to ensure normal renal function. The overall mortality rate was 3.1%. The finding that eight patients appeared to have mild renal impairment is also interesting as this is not a feature of Echis sp. bites and although it may reflect pre-existing renal disease, warrants further study. Conclusion  This study shows the lack of proper reporting of snake bite cases and the potential for snake bite to be catastrophic if patients do not present rapidly or management is delayed. The management of snakebite could be improved by use of the 20 min WBCT and rapid administration of antivenom in appropriate doses. In general, only moderate amounts of antivenom were needed to restore coagulation in most patients. The variation in clinical practice reflects lack of definitive guidance and local Omani guidelines incorporating some of these points would help to improve the management of snakebite. Conflict of interest  Funding: No funding sources. Competing interests: None declared. Ethical approval: Not required. References  [1]. [1]Kasturiratne A, Wickremashinghe R, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A, Premaratna R, et al. The global burden of snake bite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and death. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e218.
CrossRef
[2]. [2]Al Harbi N. Epidemiological and clinical differences of snake bites among children and adults in southwestern Saudi Arabia. J Accid Emerg Med. 1999;16:428–430. MEDLINE [3]. [3]Warrell DA. WHO/SEARO guidelines for the clinical management of snake bite in the Southeast Asian region. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30:S1–S85. [4]. [4]Gutierrez JM, Theakston RDG, Warrell DA. Confronting the neglected problem of snake bite envenoming: the need for a global partnership. PLOoS Med. 2006;3:e150. [5]. [5]In: Al-Wahibi S, Hastie IG, Lall SB, Mohsin N editor. National guidelines on poisoning management. Muscat, Oman: Ministry of Health; 2006;. [6]. [6]Malik GM. Snake bites in adults from the Asir region of Southern Saudi Arabia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;52(4):314–317. MEDLINE [7]. [7]Muguti GI, Maramba A, Washaya CT. Snake bites in Zimbabwe: a clinical study with emphasis on the need for antivenom. Central Afr J Med. 1994;40(4):83–88. [8]. [8]Blaylock RS. Antibiotic use and infection in snakebite victims. S Afr Med J. 1999;89(8):874–876. MEDLINE [9]. [9]Premawardhena AP, de Silva CE, Fonseka MM, Gunatilake SB, de Silva HJ. Low dose subcutaneous adrenaline to prevent acute adverse reactions to antivenom serum in people bitten by snakes: randomised, placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 1999;318(7190):1041–1043. [10]. [10]Gold BS, Dart RC, Barish RA. Bites of venomous snakes. NEJM. 2002;347:347–356.
CrossRef
[11]. [11]Lamb M, Ross DA, Lalloo DG, Green AD, Morgan E, Warrell DA. Clinical guidelines for the management of venomous bites and stings in British military personnel deployed in Iraq, Afghanistan and Cyprus. JR Army Med Corps. 2009;154:4. [12]. [12]Ghosh S, Maisnam I, Murmu BK, Mitra PK, Roy A, Simpson ID. A locally developed snakebite management protocol significantly reduces overall anti snake venom utilization in West Bengal India. Wilderness Environ Med. 2008;19:267–274. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (150 KB)
|
CrossRef
a Royal Hospital, Oman b Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom Corresponding author at: P.O. Box 2657, CPO 111, Muscat, Oman. Tel.: +968 24599000; fax: +968 24599966.
PII: S1876-0341(09)00062-8 doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2009.09.001 © 2009 King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. All rights reserved. | |
|